KAT vs. FTIF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KAT (Scharf ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KAT is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

KAT vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 24.04% return.

KAT

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 4.50%
• 6M: 14.08%
• YTD: 24.04%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 10.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	$126.29K	$72.10K	$61.82K
KAT Scharf ETF	$571.01K	$654.17K	$709.38K

KAT vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KAT Scharf ETF	3.63%	0.85%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	24.04%	4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and FTIF is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.39

KAT vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KAT	FTIF
Financial Services	27.0%	-
Healthcare	23.1%	-
Industrials	15.1%	18.2%
Technology	13.2%	4.4%
Communication Services	6.1%	-
Energy	5.7%	39.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	4.0%
Basic Materials	3.0%	20.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Real Estate	-	13.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KAT vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 88
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAT vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KAT	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.85	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.88	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.19	—

Drawdowns

KAT vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAT	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-27.83%	+18.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-1.90%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-5.90%	+2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KAT	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	15.04%	-4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	18.73%	-8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	18.73%	-8.25%

KAT vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAT vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FTIF's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.08%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
KAT Scharf ETF	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAT and FTIF in my portfolio?

KAT and FTIF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KAT or FTIF?

On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAT or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAT or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.08% for KAT.

What is the main difference between KAT and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.60% for FTIF.