PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KARS vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KARS vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.44% return.


KARS

1D
-2.51%
1M
-11.89%
6M
-8.30%
YTD
-2.50%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
-2.66%
5Y*
-6.82%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KARS vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
-2.50%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-28.04%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and UUP is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KARS vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KARS vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KARSUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.28

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

6.26

-1.34

KARS vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KARS vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KARSUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.85%

-22.19%

-42.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-3.65%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-10.05%

-37.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.85%

-10.37%

-54.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.57%

-1.26%

-39.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-8.88%

-19.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

1.33%

+4.85%

Volatility

KARS vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KARSUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.63%

1.45%

+8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

4.34%

+17.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.17%

6.03%

+22.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

7.22%

+22.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.41%

6.90%

+22.51%

KARS vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KARS vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.19%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KARS and UUP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 5-year performance, UUP leads with 5.89% vs -6.82% for KARS. On fees, KARS is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UUP has performed better with a 5.89% return vs -6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KARS is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.19% for KARS.

KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UUP is Currency. KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KARS and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer