KARS vs. ROKT
KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - KARS tracks the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index while ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KARS returned -2.35%/yr vs 24.68%/yr for ROKT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.
Performance
KARS vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 46.55% return.
KARS
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 69.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
ROKT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 60.20%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
KARS vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 16.24% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | 24.11% | 71.17% | 34.66% | -5.71% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 46.55% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KARS and ROKT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.55 |
The correlation between KARS and ROKT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
KARS vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KARS
ROKT
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KARS
ROKT
-
Basic Materials
KARS
ROKT
-
Industrials
KARS
ROKT
Technology
KARS
ROKT
Communication Services
KARS
-
ROKT
Consumer Defensive
KARS
-
ROKT
-
Energy
KARS
-
ROKT
Financial Services
KARS
-
ROKT
-
Healthcare
KARS
-
ROKT
-
Real Estate
KARS
-
ROKT
-
Utilities
KARS
-
ROKT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KARS vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
KARS
ROKT
KARS vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KARS | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.57 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.97 | 9.82 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.68 | 35.81 | -16.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KARS | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 3.88 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 1.09 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.86 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
KARS vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than ROKT's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and ROKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARS | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.85% | -43.16% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -11.40% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.79% | -23.46% | -24.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.85% | -23.46% | -41.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.15% | -8.82% | -20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.32% | -6.75% | -21.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.12% | +0.44% |
Volatility
KARS vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) is 9.00%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that KARS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KARS | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 13.10% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.66% | 24.98% | -6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 28.89% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 22.78% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.29% | 25.14% | +4.15% |
KARS vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KARS vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than ROKT's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KARS and ROKT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to KARS (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs ROKT's -43.16%.
On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.
KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.45% for ROKT.
ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KARS and ROKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer