KARS vs. KHYB
KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and KHYB (KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KARS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while KHYB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KARS returned -2.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KHYB. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KHYB.
Performance
KARS vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than KHYB's 2.50% return.
KARS
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 69.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
KHYB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
KARS vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 16.24% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | 24.11% | 71.17% | 34.66% | -17.95% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 2.50% | 9.59% | 10.79% | 3.50% | -10.15% | -12.32% | 2.00% | 8.87% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between KARS and KHYB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.20 |
KARS vs. KHYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KARS
KHYB
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KARS
KHYB
-
Basic Materials
KARS
KHYB
-
Industrials
KARS
KHYB
-
Technology
KARS
KHYB
-
Communication Services
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Consumer Defensive
KARS
-
KHYB
Energy
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Financial Services
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Healthcare
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Real Estate
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Utilities
KARS
-
KHYB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KARS vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank
KARS
KHYB
KARS vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KARS | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.71 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.97 | 2.67 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.68 | 11.98 | +7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KARS | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 3.11 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.28 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
KARS vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than KHYB's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and KHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARS | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.85% | -33.63% | -31.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -3.97% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.79% | -5.94% | -41.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.85% | -32.86% | -31.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.15% | -0.62% | -28.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.32% | -9.71% | -18.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 0.88% | +2.68% |
Volatility
KARS vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) at 0.90%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KARS | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 0.90% | +8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.66% | 3.02% | +15.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 3.40% | +22.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 6.32% | +23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.29% | 5.71% | +23.58% |
KARS vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KARS vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison
KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than KHYB's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 8.13% | 7.59% | 10.11% | 15.55% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 4.76% | 4.86% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KARS and KHYB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KARS has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to KHYB (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs KHYB's -33.63%.
On 5-year performance, KHYB leads with 0.17% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, KHYB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KHYB has performed better with a 0.17% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KHYB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.
KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while KHYB is Emerging Markets Bonds. KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KARS and KHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer