PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KARO vs. KEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KARO vs. KEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARO achieves a 44.50% return, which is significantly higher than KEN's 6.24% return.


KARO

1D
0.32%
1M
22.05%
6M
31.37%
YTD
44.50%
1Y
50.29%
3Y*
41.13%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.14%

KEN

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.07%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
6.24%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
54.12%
5Y*
31.24%
10Y*
38.18%
ALL TIME*
29.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.65M$9.23M$6.44M
$1.44M$1.46M$2.07M

KARO vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KARO
Karooooo Ltd.
44.50%3.48%91.47%8.00%-41.49%40.62%
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
6.24%126.18%62.44%-19.16%-23.73%91.13%

Correlation

The correlation between KARO and KEN is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KARO:

$1.98B

KEN:

$3.51B

EPS

KARO:

ZAR 33.15

KEN:

$1.52

PE Ratio

KARO:

32.00

KEN:

44.42

PEG Ratio

KARO:

1.48

KEN:

7.46

PS Ratio

KARO:

5.68

KEN:

3.59

PB Ratio

KARO:

9.14

KEN:

2.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

KARO:

ZAR 5.77B

KEN:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KARO:

ZAR 3.92B

KEN:

$166.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

KARO:

ZAR 2.39B

KEN:

$339.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KARO vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KARO
KARO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

KEN
KEN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KARO vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KAROKENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.45

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

3.99

-1.43

KARO vs. KEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the KEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARO and KEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KARO vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARO drawdown since its inception was -52.12%, smaller than the maximum KEN drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARO and KEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KAROKENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.12%

-69.20%

+17.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.13%

-33.19%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.31%

-33.19%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.66%

-69.20%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-29.49%

+29.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-23.26%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.70%

12.14%

+6.56%

Volatility

KARO vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison

Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) at 12.02%. This indicates that KARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KAROKENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.77%

12.02%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.75%

32.11%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.94%

40.31%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.31%

39.88%

+14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.96%

41.92%

+13.04%

Dividends

KARO vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison

KARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than KEN's 5.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KARO
Karooooo Ltd.
4.28%2.75%2.39%3.50%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
5.71%7.24%11.18%11.46%25.00%7.35%7.41%5.75%96.34%0.00%0.00%45.52%

Financials

KARO vs. KEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Karooooo Ltd. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KARO vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Karooooo Ltd. and Kenon Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KARO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Karooooo Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.07B and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

KEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.

KARO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Karooooo Ltd. reported an operating income of 409.69M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

KEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

KARO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Karooooo Ltd. reported a net income of 294.26M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.

KEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KARO and KEN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARO has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to KEN (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARO dropped -52.12% vs KEN's -69.20%.

KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KARO and KEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer