PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAI vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KAI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kadant Inc. (KAI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KAI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KAI
Kadant Inc.
2.69%-17.03%23.59%58.69%-22.50%64.41%35.18%30.68%-18.14%65.97%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-10.59%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAI achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, KAI has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 21.50%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.83% annualized return.


KAI

1D
2.62%
1M
-13.80%
YTD
2.69%
6M
-1.53%
1Y
-12.84%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
21.50%

SCHG

1D
3.67%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.59%
6M
-8.51%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAI
KAI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
KAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kadant Inc. (KAI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KAISCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

0.75

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.21

1.23

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.03

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.90

3.54

-4.44

KAI vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAI Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAI and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KAISCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

0.75

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.57

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.79

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between KAI and SCHG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KAI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

KAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KAI
Kadant Inc.
0.47%0.47%0.36%0.40%0.58%0.43%0.67%0.86%1.07%0.82%1.21%1.63%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

KAI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAI drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAI and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KAISCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.36%

-34.59%

-58.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.91%

-16.41%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.23%

-34.59%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.98%

-34.59%

-17.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.50%

-13.34%

-17.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-5.22%

-42.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.00%

4.78%

+9.22%

Volatility

KAI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Kadant Inc. (KAI) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that KAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KAISCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

6.67%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.92%

12.51%

+13.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.07%

22.43%

+17.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.17%

22.32%

+10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.44%

21.51%

+12.93%