PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. LAZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. LAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LAZ

1D
-4.51%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-13.67%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. LAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
-2.67%-1.64%54.83%6.92%-16.21%7.41%12.08%15.22%-25.38%36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between K and LAZ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2005

0.22

The correlation between K and LAZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K:

$29.20B

LAZ:

$4.95B

EPS

K:

$3.65

LAZ:

$2.61

PE Ratio

K:

22.87

LAZ:

17.77

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

LAZ:

1.50

PB Ratio

K:

6.95

LAZ:

5.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

LAZ:

$3.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

LAZ:

$1.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

LAZ:

$477.61M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. LAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

LAZ
LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. LAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

K vs. LAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLAZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

Drawdowns

K vs. LAZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLAZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.38%

Volatility

K vs. LAZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLAZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.06%

Dividends

K vs. LAZ - Dividend Comparison

K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than LAZ's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.31%4.12%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%5.88%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%

Financials

K vs. LAZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and Lazard Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
779.40M
(K) Total Revenue
(LAZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

K vs. LAZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kellogg Company and Lazard Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.3%
100.0%
Portfolio components
K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K and LAZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and LAZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer