K vs. KLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Kellogg Company (K) and WK Kellogg Co (KLG).
Performance
K vs. KLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
K vs. KLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 5.99% | 49.75% | 8.51% |
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | -21.47% |
Fundamentals
K:
$29.20B
KLG:
$1.17B
K:
$3.65
KLG:
$0.42
K:
22.87
KLG:
31.75
K:
2.30
KLG:
0.45
K:
6.95
KLG:
3.41
K:
$12.67B
KLG:
$2.61B
K:
$4.41B
KLG:
$754.00M
K:
$2.25B
KLG:
$161.00M
Returns By Period
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K vs. KLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and WK Kellogg Co (KLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Correlation
The correlation between K and KLG is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
K vs. KLG - Dividend Comparison
K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while KLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 2.07% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
K vs. KLG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility
K vs. KLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Financials
K vs. KLG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and WK Kellogg Co. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K vs. KLG - Profitability Comparison
K - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
KLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 167.00M and revenue of 613.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
K - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
KLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
K - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
KLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.