KLG vs. GOOGL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL).

Performance

KLG vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KLG vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLG WK Kellogg Co	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-21.47%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A	-8.06%	65.99%	36.01%	7.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KLG : $1.17B GOOGL : $3.52T
EPS KLG : $0.42 GOOGL : $10.83
PE Ratio KLG : 31.75 GOOGL : 26.56
PS Ratio KLG : 0.45 GOOGL : 8.72
PB Ratio KLG : 3.41 GOOGL : 8.47
Total Revenue (TTM) KLG : $2.61B GOOGL : $402.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) KLG : $754.00M GOOGL : $240.30B
EBITDA (TTM) KLG : $161.00M GOOGL : $171.18B

Returns By Period

KLG

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOGL

• 1D: 5.14%
• 1M: -7.70%
• YTD: -8.06%
• 6M: 18.45%
• 1Y: 86.60%
• 3Y*: 40.86%
• 5Y*: 22.18%
• 10Y*: 22.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KLG vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL

GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 95
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLG vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLG	GOOGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.64	—

Correlation

The correlation between KLG and GOOGL is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

KLG vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

KLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024
KLG WK Kellogg Co	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A	0.29%	0.27%	0.32%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KLG	GOOGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-65.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-16.27%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.15%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLG	GOOGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.56%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	30.87%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	28.84%	—

Financials

KLG vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WK Kellogg Co and Alphabet Inc Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 167.00M and revenue of 613.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alphabet Inc Class A reported a gross profit of 68.06B and revenue of 113.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.

KLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alphabet Inc Class A reported an operating income of 35.93B and revenue of 113.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

KLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alphabet Inc Class A reported a net income of 34.46B and revenue of 113.83B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.