PortfoliosLab logo
KLG vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KLG and GIS is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

KLG vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KLG:

-0.34

GIS:

-1.01

Sortino Ratio

KLG:

-0.33

GIS:

-1.32

Omega Ratio

KLG:

0.96

GIS:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

KLG:

-0.50

GIS:

-0.59

Martin Ratio

KLG:

-1.00

GIS:

-1.57

Ulcer Index

KLG:

17.66%

GIS:

13.77%

Daily Std Dev

KLG:

45.24%

GIS:

21.78%

Max Drawdown

KLG:

-42.06%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

KLG:

-26.42%

GIS:

-36.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KLG:

$1.53B

GIS:

$29.44B

EPS

KLG:

$0.65

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

KLG:

27.28

GIS:

11.82

PEG Ratio

KLG:

0.27

GIS:

3.57

PS Ratio

KLG:

0.57

GIS:

1.50

PB Ratio

KLG:

4.68

GIS:

3.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

KLG:

$2.66B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KLG:

$776.00M

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

KLG:

$165.00M

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLG achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -14.70% return.


KLG

YTD

-2.91%

1M

-11.59%

6M

0.84%

1Y

-15.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GIS

YTD

-14.70%

1M

-9.69%

6M

-16.61%

1Y

-21.83%

5Y*

0.11%

10Y*

2.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLG vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLG is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLG is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLG is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLG is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLG is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLG is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KLG vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLG and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KLG vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

KLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than GIS's 4.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KLG
WK Kellogg Co
3.72%3.56%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.50%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

KLG vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLG drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLG and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KLG vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

WK Kellogg Co (KLG) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.26%. This indicates that KLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KLG vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WK Kellogg Co and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
663.00M
4.84B
(KLG) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KLG vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WK Kellogg Co and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
28.5%
33.9%
(KLG) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
KLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 189.00M and revenue of 663.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

KLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 20.00M and revenue of 663.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

KLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 18.00M and revenue of 663.00M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.