KLG vs. GIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KLG (WK Kellogg Co) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KLG vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KLG

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GIS

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: -28.66%
• 6M: -28.20%
• 1Y: -37.41%
• 3Y*: -24.38%
• 5Y*: -9.55%
• 10Y*: -3.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLG vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLG WK Kellogg Co	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-21.47%
GIS General Mills, Inc.	-28.66%	-23.75%	1.45%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between KLG and GIS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap KLG : $1.17B GIS : $17.45B
EPS KLG : $0.42 GIS : $4.08
PE Ratio KLG : 31.75 GIS : 7.88
PS Ratio KLG : 0.45 GIS : 0.95
PB Ratio KLG : 3.41 GIS : 1.87
Total Revenue (TTM) KLG : $2.61B GIS : $18.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) KLG : $754.00M GIS : $4.70B
EBITDA (TTM) KLG : $161.00M GIS : $3.03B

Return for Risk

KLG vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS

GIS Risk / Return Rank: 1
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLG vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLG	GIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.42	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KLG	GIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.63%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-59.63%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.25%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLG	GIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	23.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.09%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.08%	—

Dividends

KLG vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

KLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIS General Mills, Inc.	7.58%	5.20%	3.73%	3.47%	2.50%	3.03%	3.37%	3.66%	5.03%	3.27%	3.01%	3.00%
KLG WK Kellogg Co	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

KLG vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WK Kellogg Co and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 167.00M and revenue of 613.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

KLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLG and GIS in my portfolio?

KLG and GIS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.