KLG vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Performance
KLG vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KLG vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -21.47% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -18.85% | -23.75% | 1.45% | 2.67% |
Fundamentals
KLG:
$1.17B
GIS:
$20.19B
KLG:
$0.42
GIS:
$4.07
KLG:
31.75
GIS:
9.15
KLG:
0.45
GIS:
1.10
KLG:
3.41
GIS:
2.16
KLG:
$2.61B
GIS:
$18.37B
KLG:
$754.00M
GIS:
$4.70B
KLG:
$161.00M
GIS:
$3.03B
Returns By Period
KLG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -24.64%
- 1Y
- -34.57%
- 3Y*
- -21.17%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- -1.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLG vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
KLG
GIS
KLG vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLG | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.43 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between KLG and GIS is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KLG vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
KLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.53% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
KLG vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLG | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -54.09% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.07% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.79% | — |
Volatility
KLG vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KLG | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.76% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.89% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.97% | — |
Financials
KLG vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WK Kellogg Co and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLG vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
KLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 167.00M and revenue of 613.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
KLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.