KLG vs. PM
KLG (WK Kellogg Co) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KLG in Packaged Foods, PM in Tobacco. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KLG vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KLG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PM
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- 1Y
- -0.11%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
KLG vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -21.47% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 10.67% | 37.99% | 34.34% | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLG and PM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
KLG:
$1.17B
PM:
$274.96B
KLG:
$0.42
PM:
$7.12
KLG:
31.75
PM:
24.72
KLG:
0.45
PM:
6.61
KLG:
$2.61B
PM:
$41.49B
KLG:
$754.00M
PM:
$27.93B
KLG:
$161.00M
PM:
$17.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLG vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
KLG
PM
KLG vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WK Kellogg Co (KLG) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLG | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.52 | — |
Drawdowns
KLG vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLG | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -42.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -8.30% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.03% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.75% | — |
Volatility
KLG vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLG | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.55% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.69% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.43% | — |
Dividends
KLG vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
KLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLG WK Kellogg Co | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.27% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
KLG vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WK Kellogg Co and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLG vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
KLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a gross profit of 167.00M and revenue of 613.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
KLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
KLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WK Kellogg Co reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 613.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLG and PM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KLG and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer