K.TO vs. LUG.TO
K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) and LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, K.TO returned 19.71%/yr vs 32.69%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -26.40% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 19.71%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 32.69% annualized return.
K.TO
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 6M
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- 67.56%
- 3Y*
- 79.11%
- 5Y*
- 32.58%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -26.40%
- 6M
- -24.67%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 79.74%
- 5Y*
- 53.19%
- 10Y*
- 32.69%
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -7.26% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | -20.24% | 52.79% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -26.40% | 291.22% | 91.60% | 29.55% | 30.60% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 66.93% | 10.15% | -13.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and LUG.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, K.TO and LUG.TO have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
LUG.TO:
CA$18.65B
K.TO:
$2.36
LUG.TO:
$3.77
K.TO:
10.83
LUG.TO:
14.57
K.TO:
0.14
LUG.TO:
0.19
K.TO:
3.90
LUG.TO:
6.66
K.TO:
3.39
LUG.TO:
9.79
K.TO:
$7.97B
LUG.TO:
$2.00B
K.TO:
$4.26B
LUG.TO:
$1.41B
K.TO:
$5.03B
LUG.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
LUG.TO
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.46 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 1.23 | +4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, roughly equal to the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -94.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and LUG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -94.74% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.29% | -37.89% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.29% | -37.89% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.71% | -37.89% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.36% | -41.84% | -26.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.94% | -34.73% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.98% | -67.67% | +11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 14.24% | -1.95% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) have volatilities of 18.19% and 17.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.19% | 17.86% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.35% | 42.07% | -2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.98% | 55.97% | -4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 46.54% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 43.40% | +2.21% |
Dividends
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than LUG.TO's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 6.79% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K.TO vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
K.TO and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K.TO and LUG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer