JVAL vs. EQWL
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.29%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for EQWL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQWL.
Performance
JVAL vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than EQWL's 8.74% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
EQWL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
JVAL vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 8.74% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and EQWL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JVAL and EQWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
JVAL vs. EQWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
EQWL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JVAL
EQWL
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
EQWL
Financial Services
JVAL
EQWL
Healthcare
JVAL
EQWL
Industrials
JVAL
EQWL
Communication Services
JVAL
EQWL
Energy
JVAL
EQWL
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
EQWL
Real Estate
JVAL
EQWL
Basic Materials
JVAL
EQWL
Utilities
JVAL
EQWL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
EQWL
JVAL vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVAL | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 2.83 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.70 | 11.94 | +6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVAL | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.12 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum EQWL drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and EQWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -49.36% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -7.76% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -14.95% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -22.99% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.53% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -6.70% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.84% | +0.30% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 2.66%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 2.66% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 7.66% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 10.37% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 14.98% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 16.79% | +3.03% |
JVAL vs. EQWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EQWL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JVAL vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than EQWL's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.54% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVAL and EQWL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to EQWL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs EQWL's -49.36%.
On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 11.79% for EQWL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQWL.
JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.54% for EQWL.
JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EQWL is Large Cap Blend Equities. JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.25% for EQWL.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and EQWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer