JUP.L vs. CWK.L
JUP.L (Jupiter Fund Management plc) and CWK.L (Cranswick plc) are both stocks. JUP.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CWK.L operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, JUP.L returned -2.26%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for CWK.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUP.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than CWK.L's 9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, JUP.L has underperformed CWK.L with an annualized return of -2.26%, while CWK.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.
JUP.L
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 94.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- -2.26%
CWK.L
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUP.L Jupiter Fund Management plc | 11.31% | 91.85% | 0.89% | -25.11% | -42.29% | -2.40% | -25.86% | 50.47% | -49.66% | 51.56% |
CWK.L Cranswick plc | 9.18% | 3.90% | 30.30% | 26.64% | -14.83% | 7.15% | 5.64% | 31.57% | -19.75% | 44.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUP.L and CWK.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2010 | 0.23 |
The correlation between JUP.L and CWK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JUP.L:
£947.03M
CWK.L:
£2.97B
JUP.L:
£0.30
CWK.L:
£5.36
JUP.L:
5.66
CWK.L:
10.09
JUP.L:
0.39
CWK.L:
0.91
JUP.L:
1.12
CWK.L:
0.52
JUP.L:
1.05
CWK.L:
2.72
JUP.L:
£838.00M
CWK.L:
£5.71B
JUP.L:
£760.80M
CWK.L:
£891.40M
JUP.L:
£242.30M
CWK.L:
£617.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUP.L vs. CWK.L — Risk / Return Rank
JUP.L
CWK.L
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jupiter Fund Management plc (JUP.L) and Cranswick plc (CWK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUP.L | CWK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.05 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 0.36 | +4.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 0.76 | +11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUP.L | CWK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 0.20 | +2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.39 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.46 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.64 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUP.L drawdown since its inception was -81.45%, which is greater than CWK.L's maximum drawdown of -50.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUP.L and CWK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUP.L | CWK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.45% | -50.39% | -31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -9.70% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.20% | -10.61% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.90% | -36.21% | -33.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.45% | -36.21% | -45.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.20% | -2.70% | -46.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -11.04% | -22.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.94% | 4.63% | +3.31% |
Volatility
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Volatility Comparison
Jupiter Fund Management plc (JUP.L) and Cranswick plc (CWK.L) have volatilities of 8.19% and 8.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUP.L | CWK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 8.18% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 13.82% | +9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 17.57% | +14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.49% | 20.70% | +15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.17% | 23.65% | +10.52% |
Dividends
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Dividend Comparison
JUP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than CWK.L's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK.L Cranswick plc | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.48% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 1.67% | 2.07% | 1.38% | 1.66% | 1.82% |
JUP.L Jupiter Fund Management plc | 6.02% | 2.71% | 7.61% | 7.39% | 12.88% | 7.84% | 6.06% | 6.96% | 11.42% | 4.69% | 5.86% | 5.53% |
Financials
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jupiter Fund Management plc and Cranswick plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JUP.L vs. CWK.L - Profitability Comparison
JUP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jupiter Fund Management plc reported a gross profit of 274.90M and revenue of 302.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.8%.
CWK.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported a gross profit of 243.70M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.
JUP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jupiter Fund Management plc reported an operating income of 102.20M and revenue of 302.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.
CWK.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported an operating income of 123.00M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
JUP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jupiter Fund Management plc reported a net income of 78.90M and revenue of 302.90M, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
CWK.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JUP.L and CWK.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JUP.L and CWK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer