PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWK.L vs. AUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CWK.L vs. AUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CWK.L is traded in GBp, while AUR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AUR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWK.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than AUR's 65.97% return.


CWK.L

1D
-1.81%
1M
1.12%
YTD
9.18%
6M
6.85%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
10.90%

AUR

1D
-7.17%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
65.97%
6M
41.39%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
56.94%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWK.L vs. AUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CWK.L
Cranswick plc
9.18%3.90%30.30%26.64%-14.83%0.47%
AUR
Aurora Innovation, Inc.
65.97%-43.39%46.68%243.11%-87.98%17.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CWK.L and AUR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

0.04

The correlation between CWK.L and AUR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CWK.L:

£2.97B

AUR:

$12.29B

EPS

CWK.L:

£5.36

AUR:

-$0.44

PS Ratio

CWK.L:

0.52

AUR:

2.98K

PB Ratio

CWK.L:

2.72

AUR:

6.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWK.L:

£5.71B

AUR:

$4.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWK.L:

£891.40M

AUR:

$163.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CWK.L:

£617.20M

AUR:

-$882.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWK.L vs. AUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWK.L
CWK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CWK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CWK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AUR
AUR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWK.L vs. AUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWK.LAURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.09

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.32

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

0.56

+0.20

CWK.L vs. AUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the AUR Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWK.L and AUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWK.LAURDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.23

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.08

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

-0.09

+0.73

Drawdowns

CWK.L vs. AUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWK.L drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum AUR drawdown of -92.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK.L and AUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWK.LAURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-92.64%

+42.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-42.39%

+32.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.61%

-65.49%

+54.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.21%

-92.64%

+56.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-62.83%

+60.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.04%

-66.66%

+55.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

24.51%

-19.88%

Volatility

CWK.L vs. AUR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) is 8.18%, while Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) has a volatility of 24.00%. This indicates that CWK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWK.LAURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

24.00%

-15.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

47.69%

-33.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

60.68%

-43.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

89.16%

-68.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

88.53%

-64.88%

Dividends

CWK.L vs. AUR - Dividend Comparison

CWK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while AUR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUR
Aurora Innovation, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CWK.L
Cranswick plc
1.90%2.08%1.90%2.14%2.48%1.93%1.77%1.67%2.07%1.38%1.66%1.82%

Financials

CWK.L vs. AUR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cranswick plc and Aurora Innovation, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.51B
1.00M
(CWK.L) Total Revenue
(AUR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CWK.L values in GBp, AUR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CWK.L and AUR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWK.L and AUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer