CWK.L vs. GRG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Greggs plc (GRG.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWK.L or GRG.L.
Key characteristics
| CWK.L | GRG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.68% | 12.23% |
| 1Y Return | 43.42% | 6.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.57% | 9.08% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.08% | 10.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.36% | 22.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 0.31 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.30% | 23.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.86% | -53.29% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -6.99% |
Fundamentals
| CWK.L | GRG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £2.34B | £2.85B |
| EPS | £2.35 | £1.39 |
| PE Ratio | 18.40 | 20.22 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.89 | 0.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | £2.46B | £1.81B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £281.00M | £938.30M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | £215.50M | £238.90M |
Correlation
The correlation between CWK.L and GRG.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CWK.L achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than GRG.L's 12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CWK.L has underperformed GRG.L with an annualized return of 16.36%, while GRG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Greggs plc (GRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Dividend Comparison
CWK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than GRG.L's 0.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK.L Cranswick plc | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
GRG.L Greggs plc | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWK.L drawdown since its inception was -63.86%, which is greater than GRG.L's maximum drawdown of -53.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK.L and GRG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Volatility Comparison
Cranswick plc (CWK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Greggs plc (GRG.L) at 4.50%. This indicates that CWK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CWK.L vs. GRG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cranswick plc and Greggs plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities