CWK.L vs. BARC.L
CWK.L (Cranswick plc) and BARC.L (Barclays plc) are both stocks. CWK.L operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while BARC.L operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CWK.L returned 10.90%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for BARC.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWK.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than BARC.L's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CWK.L has underperformed BARC.L with an annualized return of 10.90%, while BARC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.
CWK.L
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
BARC.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 44.69%
- 3Y*
- 48.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK.L Cranswick plc | 9.18% | 3.90% | 30.30% | 26.64% | -14.83% | 7.15% | 5.64% | 31.57% | -19.75% | 44.71% |
BARC.L Barclays plc | -1.40% | 82.21% | 82.41% | 1.75% | -12.10% | 29.66% | -15.28% | 24.81% | -24.21% | -7.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWK.L and BARC.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1989 | 0.13 |
The correlation between CWK.L and BARC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CWK.L:
£2.97B
BARC.L:
£63.68B
CWK.L:
£5.36
BARC.L:
£0.52
CWK.L:
10.09
BARC.L:
8.93
CWK.L:
0.91
BARC.L:
1.47
CWK.L:
0.52
BARC.L:
1.59
CWK.L:
2.72
BARC.L:
0.83
CWK.L:
£5.71B
BARC.L:
£40.71B
CWK.L:
£891.40M
BARC.L:
£40.18B
CWK.L:
£617.20M
BARC.L:
£9.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWK.L vs. BARC.L — Risk / Return Rank
CWK.L
BARC.L
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Barclays plc (BARC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWK.L | BARC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.26 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.83 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 5.48 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWK.L | BARC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.53 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.79 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.22 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWK.L drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum BARC.L drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK.L and BARC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWK.L | BARC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -92.40% | +42.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | -24.59% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.61% | -24.59% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.21% | -35.28% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.21% | -62.28% | +26.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -6.44% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -33.71% | +22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 8.22% | -3.59% |
Volatility
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) is 8.18%, while Barclays plc (BARC.L) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that CWK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BARC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWK.L | BARC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 10.03% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 23.54% | -9.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 29.38% | -11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 31.06% | -10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 34.31% | -10.66% |
Dividends
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Dividend Comparison
CWK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than BARC.L's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARC.L Barclays plc | 1.85% | 1.79% | 3.06% | 5.01% | 3.94% | 1.60% | 4.09% | 3.90% | 2.99% | 1.48% | 2.01% | 2.97% |
CWK.L Cranswick plc | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.48% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 1.67% | 2.07% | 1.38% | 1.66% | 1.82% |
Financials
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cranswick plc and Barclays plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CWK.L vs. BARC.L - Profitability Comparison
CWK.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported a gross profit of 243.70M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.
BARC.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays plc reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CWK.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported an operating income of 123.00M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
BARC.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays plc reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
CWK.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cranswick plc reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
BARC.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays plc reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CWK.L and BARC.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CWK.L and BARC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer