CWK.L vs. ATS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CWK.L (Cranswick plc) and ATS.L (Artemis Alpha Trust) are both stocks. CWK.L operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ATS.L operates in Collective Investments (Financial Services). At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CWK.L vs. ATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Artemis Alpha Trust (ATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CWK.L

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 10.90%

ATS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWK.L vs. ATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWK.L Cranswick plc	9.18%	3.90%	30.30%	26.64%	-14.83%	7.15%	5.64%	31.57%	-19.75%	44.71%
ATS.L Artemis Alpha Trust	0.00%	0.00%	13.19%	8.48%	-23.43%	1.79%	14.53%	32.59%	-12.99%	20.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CWK.L and ATS.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2000	0.09

The correlation between CWK.L and ATS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) CWK.L : £5.71B ATS.L : £22.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) CWK.L : £891.40M ATS.L : £21.42M
EBITDA (TTM) CWK.L : £617.20M ATS.L : £25.14M

Return for Risk

CWK.L vs. ATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWK.L

CWK.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
CWK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CWK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CWK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CWK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CWK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWK.L vs. ATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cranswick plc (CWK.L) and Artemis Alpha Trust (ATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CWK.L	ATS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CWK.L	ATS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CWK.L	ATS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.04%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CWK.L	ATS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.65%	—	—

Dividends

CWK.L vs. ATS.L - Dividend Comparison

CWK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while ATS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATS.L Artemis Alpha Trust	0.00%	0.00%	2.17%	0.01%	0.02%	0.01%	0.55%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.01%	1.09%
CWK.L Cranswick plc	1.90%	2.08%	1.90%	2.14%	2.48%	1.93%	1.77%	1.67%	2.07%	1.38%	1.66%	1.82%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWK.L and ATS.L in my portfolio?

CWK.L and ATS.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.