PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUNZ vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUNZ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNZ achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


JUNZ

1D
-0.96%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
6.52%
6M
5.75%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNZ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
6.52%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.87%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2021

0.07

The correlation between JUNZ and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JUNZUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.17

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

9.39

+0.12

JUNZ vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNZ and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUNZUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-86.59%

+68.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-18.96%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-26.68%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-38.11%

+20.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-18.05%

+15.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-36.69%

+32.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

6.43%

-4.51%

Volatility

JUNZ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) is 3.39%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that JUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUNZUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

9.24%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

30.57%

-22.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

35.22%

-24.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

34.45%

-22.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

37.22%

-25.47%

JUNZ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUNZ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.16%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUNZ and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to JUNZ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNZ dropped -17.88% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 9.35% for JUNZ. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, JUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JUNZ.

JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

JUNZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. JUNZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JUNZ and 0.75% for UGA.

JUNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUNZ and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer