JUNZ vs. JULB
JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. JUNZ is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JUNZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
JUNZ vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JUNZ having a 6.52% return and JULB slightly lower at 6.38%.
JUNZ
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUNZ vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 6.52% | 2.14% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.38% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUNZ and JULB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUNZ vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
JUNZ
JULB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JUNZ vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JUNZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JUNZ vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUNZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -5.24% | -12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -0.43% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -0.83% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
JUNZ vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUNZ | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 6.84% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 6.84% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 6.84% | +4.91% |
JUNZ vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUNZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUNZ vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 2.16% | 2.30% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 0.56% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JUNZ and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JUNZ.
JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JUNZ and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for JUNZ and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer