JULZ vs. QFLR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. JULZ is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, JULZ returned 15.93% vs 18.52% for QFLR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JULZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

JULZ vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's 4.38% return.

JULZ

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 5.93%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 1Y: 15.93%
• 3Y*: 14.94%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 4.38%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULZ vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	7.69%	13.23%	16.91%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	4.38%	17.27%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and QFLR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.86

The correlation between JULZ and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JULZ vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 55
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JULZ	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.39	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.90	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.44	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	9.18	-1.46

JULZ vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULZ	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-13.97%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-7.61%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-2.82%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-2.51%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.02%	+0.05%

Volatility

JULZ vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is 3.74%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that JULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULZ	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	6.48%	-2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	10.70%	-1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.91%	13.44%	-2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.32%	13.28%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.35%	13.28%	-0.93%

JULZ vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULZ vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.11%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULZ and QFLR in my portfolio?

JULZ and QFLR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JULZ or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to JULZ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULZ dropped -14.71% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, JULZ or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 18.52% vs 15.93% for JULZ. On fees, JULZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, JULZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULZ or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 15.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULZ or QFLR?

JULZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULZ or QFLR?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.11%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between JULZ and QFLR?

JULZ is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULZ and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.