PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULQ vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULQ vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QFLR

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.24%
YTD
6.83%
6M
5.81%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULQ vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


JULQ vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JULQ
QFLR

Technology

31.7%
50.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.9%

Healthcare

10.9%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

9.5%
18.4%

Industrials

7.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
9.2%

Energy

3.2%
1.1%

Utilities

2.6%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.0%

Technology

JULQ
31.7%
QFLR
50.8%

Financial Services

JULQ
14.0%
QFLR
0.9%

Healthcare

JULQ
10.9%
QFLR
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JULQ
10.4%
QFLR
12.1%

Communication Services

JULQ
9.5%
QFLR
18.4%

Industrials

JULQ
7.7%
QFLR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

JULQ
6.2%
QFLR
9.2%

Energy

JULQ
3.2%
QFLR
1.1%

Utilities

JULQ
2.6%
QFLR
1.5%

Real Estate

JULQ
2.3%
QFLR

-

Basic Materials

JULQ
1.8%
QFLR
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULQ vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULQ

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULQ vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULQ vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULQQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

Drawdowns

JULQ vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and QFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULQQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.97%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.54%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.49%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

JULQ vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULQQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

11.27%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.61%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.61%

-12.61%

JULQ vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULQ vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULQ nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
JULQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

JULQ and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JULQ is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.89% for QFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULQ and QFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer