PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULB vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULB vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULB achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


JULB

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULB vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JULB and UXJL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULB vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULB vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULBUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

1.87

+0.30

Drawdowns

JULB vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULB drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULB and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULBUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-10.29%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.76%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-1.51%

+0.64%

Volatility

JULB vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULBUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

13.90%

-7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

13.90%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

13.90%

-7.09%

JULB vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULB vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULB nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JULB and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

JULB and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JULB and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULB and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer