PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JTSSX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JTSSX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 12.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JTSSX having a 10.94% annualized return and JRLVX not far ahead at 11.36%.


JTSSX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.35%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.44%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.94%

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
9.88%17.88%12.31%22.36%-18.58%17.53%15.33%24.81%-9.87%21.92%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JTSSX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.99

The correlation between JTSSX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JTSSX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JTSSX
JTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JTSSXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.31

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

14.68

-3.39

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JTSSX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JTSSXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.50

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.71

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JTSSX drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than JRLVX's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JTSSX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JTSSXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-32.53%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-8.50%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-15.27%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-25.64%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-32.53%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-4.56%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.91%

+0.17%

Volatility

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JTSSXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.34%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.96%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

11.27%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

14.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.99%

-0.27%

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JTSSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JTSSX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

JTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
4.69%5.16%2.58%1.57%10.75%16.31%4.46%9.76%5.08%3.84%2.97%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JTSSX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JTSSX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to JRLVX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JTSSX dropped -50.11% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JTSSX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer