PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JTSSX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JTSSX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JTSSX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.


JTSSX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.35%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.44%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.94%

FRQIX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
9.88%17.88%12.31%22.36%-18.58%17.53%15.33%24.81%-9.87%21.92%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
4.05%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between JTSSX and FRQIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.90

The correlation between JTSSX and FRQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JTSSX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JTSSX
JTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JTSSXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.07

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

13.08

-1.79

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JTSSX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JTSSXFRQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.53

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.53

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.94

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.56

-0.09

Drawdowns

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JTSSX drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than FRQIX's maximum drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JTSSX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JTSSXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-38.01%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-3.43%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-5.21%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-17.04%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-17.04%

-16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-4.43%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.80%

+1.28%

Volatility

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.66%. This indicates that JTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JTSSXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

1.66%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

3.42%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

4.15%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

5.57%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

5.33%

+10.39%

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JTSSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

JTSSX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

JTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.04%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
4.69%5.16%2.58%1.57%10.75%16.31%4.46%9.76%5.08%3.84%2.97%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JTSSX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JTSSX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JTSSX dropped -50.11% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JTSSX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer