JSML vs. FSMD
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JSML tracks the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index while FSMD tracks the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSML returned 6.09%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for FSMD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.
Performance
JSML vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 14.85% return.
JSML
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
FSMD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- —
JSML vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.06% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 10.54% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 14.85% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and FSMD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between JSML and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
FSMD
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
FSMD
Industrials
JSML
FSMD
Healthcare
JSML
FSMD
Financial Services
JSML
FSMD
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
FSMD
Real Estate
JSML
FSMD
Basic Materials
JSML
FSMD
Consumer Defensive
JSML
FSMD
Energy
JSML
FSMD
Communication Services
JSML
FSMD
Utilities
JSML
-
FSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
FSMD
JSML vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSML | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.06 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 11.03 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSML | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.69 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and FSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -40.67% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -8.44% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -22.16% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -22.16% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.08% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -6.00% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.34% | +1.83% |
Volatility
JSML vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.45%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 4.45% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 11.37% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 15.26% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 18.48% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 21.42% | +2.85% |
JSML vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FSMD's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and FSMD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to FSMD (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs FSMD's -40.67%.
On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.66% vs 6.09% for JSML. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.
FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.80% for JSML.
JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.29% for FSMD.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and FSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer