PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. BBMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than BBMC's 16.66% return.


JSML

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.59%
YTD
19.06%
6M
17.83%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
12.88%

BBMC

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.66%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSML vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.06%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%79.04%
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.66%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%61.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and BBMC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.92

The correlation between JSML and BBMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSML vs. BBMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSML
BBMC

Technology

24.8%
21.6%

Industrials

23.4%
18.6%

Healthcare

20.9%
10.0%

Financial Services

9.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
11.5%

Real Estate

3.4%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.5%

Energy

2.2%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Technology

JSML
24.8%
BBMC
21.6%

Industrials

JSML
23.4%
BBMC
18.6%

Healthcare

JSML
20.9%
BBMC
10.0%

Financial Services

JSML
9.2%
BBMC
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JSML
5.8%
BBMC
11.5%

Real Estate

JSML
3.4%
BBMC
6.3%

Basic Materials

JSML
2.9%
BBMC
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

JSML
2.6%
BBMC
3.5%

Energy

JSML
2.2%
BBMC
3.1%

Communication Services

JSML
2.1%
BBMC
2.4%

Utilities

JSML

-

BBMC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSML vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMLBBMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.41

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

13.41

-5.33

JSML vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and BBMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMLBBMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.04

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.41

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.85

-0.28

Drawdowns

JSML vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and BBMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLBBMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-30.11%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-9.75%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-24.18%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-30.11%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.12%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-8.92%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.47%

+1.70%

Volatility

JSML vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) at 4.72%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLBBMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

4.72%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

12.14%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.56%

16.32%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.34%

20.59%

+3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

21.08%

+3.19%

JSML vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than BBMC's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.80%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSML and BBMC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to BBMC (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs BBMC's -30.11%.

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs 6.09% for JSML. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.80% for JSML.

JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.07% for BBMC.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and BBMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer