PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTVX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRTVX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.74% return.


JRTVX

1D
0.58%
1M
0.52%
6M
7.86%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
19.78%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*

LTSTX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.26%
6M
3.23%
YTD
4.74%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRTVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
10.26%17.91%12.73%16.55%-18.24%17.27%15.79%24.46%-8.25%7.04%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
4.74%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.70%20.50%-6.41%11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTVX and LTSTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017

0.96

The correlation between JRTVX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTVX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTVX
JRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRTVXLTSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.96

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

8.63

+2.03

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTVX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTVX drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTVX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTVXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-48.17%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-5.24%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-8.12%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-21.01%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.52%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-6.13%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.19%

+0.64%

Volatility

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.45%. This indicates that JRTVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTVXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

2.45%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

5.95%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

7.08%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

9.24%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

9.76%

+5.93%

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTVX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRTVX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

JRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than LTSTX's 11.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRTVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
2.69%2.97%1.88%2.05%7.35%5.73%4.57%8.90%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.64%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JRTVX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRTVX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to LTSTX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTVX dropped -31.52% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

JRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTVX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer