PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTVX vs. FCQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JRTVX having a 10.39% return and FCQTX slightly higher at 10.51%.


JRTVX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.03%
YTD
10.39%
6M
10.96%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*

FCQTX

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.51%
6M
11.12%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JRTVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
10.39%17.91%12.73%16.55%-18.24%17.27%46.19%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
10.51%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTVX and FCQTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020

0.97

The correlation between JRTVX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTVX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTVX
JRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRTVXFCQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.64

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

12.00

+1.79

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTVX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRTVXFCQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.16

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.68

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.12

-0.50

Drawdowns

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTVX drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, which is greater than FCQTX's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTVX and FCQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTVXFCQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-27.34%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-9.83%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-15.53%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-27.34%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.58%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-5.88%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.16%

-0.39%

Volatility

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTVX) is 3.21%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that JRTVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTVXFCQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.62%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

9.64%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

12.04%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

14.72%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

15.05%

+0.65%

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTVX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRTVX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

JRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than FCQTX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.22%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%0.00%
JRTVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
2.69%2.97%1.88%2.05%7.35%5.73%4.57%8.90%11.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JRTVX and FCQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCQTX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to JRTVX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTVX dropped -31.52% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

JRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTVX and FCQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer