PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTIX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTIX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2030 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRTIX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than URINX's 5.76% return.


JRTIX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.24%
YTD
8.24%
6M
8.56%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*

URINX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.76%
6M
6.22%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTIX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRTIX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2030 Lifetime Portfolio
8.24%14.83%9.55%13.58%-17.14%13.76%14.04%21.96%-6.87%4.78%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.76%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTIX and URINX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2017

0.93

The correlation between JRTIX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTIX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTIX
JRTIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JRTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTIX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2030 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRTIXURINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.50

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.39

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

14.73

-0.80

JRTIX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTIX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRTIXURINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.80

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.14

-0.55

Drawdowns

JRTIX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTIX drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTIX and URINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTIXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-15.27%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-3.92%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.29%

-4.84%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.75%

-15.27%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.17%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-1.91%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

0.90%

+0.47%

Volatility

JRTIX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2030 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTIX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 1.84%. This indicates that JRTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTIXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.84%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.33%

4.24%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.90%

5.19%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.18%

6.29%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.03%

5.84%

+7.19%

JRTIX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTIX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRTIX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

JRTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than URINX's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRTIX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2030 Lifetime Portfolio
2.40%2.59%2.43%2.47%7.47%5.97%4.79%7.59%9.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.78%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JRTIX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRTIX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to URINX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTIX dropped -27.48% vs URINX's -15.27%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTIX and URINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer