JRLVX vs. TAGRX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) and TAGRX (John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - JRLVX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock, while TAGRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JRLVX returned 11.27%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for TAGRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JRLVX charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TAGRX.

Performance

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLVX achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JRLVX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 11.27%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.

JRLVX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

TAGRX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 3.34%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 16.45%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.90%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-8.29%	17.40%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	3.63%	9.98%	21.14%	32.23%	-24.86%	29.16%	20.55%	35.06%	-14.09%	19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLVX and TAGRX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013	0.92

The correlation between JRLVX and TAGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JRLVX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 71
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

TAGRX

TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 19
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRLVX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.32	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.84	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.23	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	1.18	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	4.14	+9.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the TAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLVX and TAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRLVX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	1.32	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.43	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.62	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.47	+0.18

Drawdowns

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLVX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLVX and TAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRLVX	TAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-58.45%	+25.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-14.04%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	-26.11%	+10.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	-29.10%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.53%	-36.96%	+4.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.48%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-11.54%	+6.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	4.01%	-2.10%

Volatility

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) at 3.17%. This indicates that JRLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRLVX	TAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.17%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	9.65%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	12.59%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	20.19%	-5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	20.50%	-4.52%

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLVX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRLVX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison

JRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than TAGRX's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	11.67%	12.09%	13.00%	6.67%	6.76%	7.82%	0.30%	0.53%	14.05%	8.22%	2.96%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRLVX and TAGRX in my portfolio?

JRLVX and TAGRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRLVX or TAGRX?

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TAGRX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLVX dropped -32.53% vs TAGRX's -58.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.