PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRLVX vs. SVBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLVX achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than SVBAX's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, JRLVX has outperformed SVBAX with an annualized return of 11.27%, while SVBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.


JRLVX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.06%
YTD
11.90%
6M
12.35%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.27%

SVBAX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.31%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.04%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.90%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
10.41%15.69%13.31%18.22%-15.79%14.49%15.97%21.28%-5.02%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLVX and SVBAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.94

The correlation between JRLVX and SVBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRLVX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SVBAX
SVBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SVBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SVBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRLVXSVBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.33

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

21.38

-7.31

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the SVBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLVX and SVBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRLVXSVBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.94

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.84

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.93

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.70

-0.05

Drawdowns

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLVX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum SVBAX drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLVX and SVBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRLVXSVBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-40.81%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-5.57%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-12.06%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-20.53%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-21.00%

-11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.15%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-5.24%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.13%

+0.78%

Volatility

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) at 2.43%. This indicates that JRLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRLVXSVBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.43%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

6.50%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

8.22%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

10.78%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

10.79%

+5.19%

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLVX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRLVX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison

JRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than SVBAX's 11.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
11.31%12.45%3.72%1.48%1.60%2.73%1.60%2.19%8.06%3.51%1.70%4.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JRLVX and SVBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to SVBAX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLVX dropped -32.53% vs SVBAX's -40.81%.

SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRLVX and SVBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer