PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JPUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.30%
6M
11.04%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
11.51%
ALL TIME*
12.18%

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$730.62K$1.08M$1.02M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JPUS vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and SPXM is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPUS vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.16

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

10.12

+4.20

JPUS vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-5.08%

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-5.08%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.75%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-0.78%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

JPUS vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that JPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

0.00%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

1.22%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

7.38%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

7.39%

+7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

7.39%

+9.33%

JPUS vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPUS vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.96%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and SPXM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, JPUS leads with 23.92% vs 8.90% for SPXM. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.47% for SPXM.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer