PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 14.81% return. Over the past 10 years, JPUS has outperformed SMLV with an annualized return of 11.36%, while SMLV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.


JPUS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.86%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.70%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
11.36%

SMLV

1D
0.20%
1M
1.40%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.50%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
10.87%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.81%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and SMLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015

0.79

The correlation between JPUS and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPUS vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
SMLV

Technology

11.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

11.5%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
4.3%

Real Estate

10.5%
12.2%

Industrials

10.4%
14.3%

Utilities

9.5%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
8.7%

Financial Services

8.0%
30.5%

Energy

7.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

6.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
2.2%

Technology

JPUS
11.6%
SMLV
11.2%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.5%
SMLV
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.3%
SMLV
4.3%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
SMLV
12.2%

Industrials

JPUS
10.4%
SMLV
14.3%

Utilities

JPUS
9.5%
SMLV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
SMLV
8.7%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.0%
SMLV
30.5%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
SMLV
1.8%

Basic Materials

JPUS
6.8%
SMLV
3.2%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.5%
SMLV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPUSSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.21

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

8.78

+2.82

JPUS vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPUSSMLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.50

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.55

+0.17

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-42.45%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.34%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-20.40%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-20.40%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

-42.45%

+3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-5.45%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.68%

-0.96%

Volatility

JPUS vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.55%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

4.09%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

9.92%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

15.73%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.29%

-3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

20.96%

-4.20%

JPUS vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than SMLV's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.06%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and SMLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to JPUS (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.36% vs 10.25% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 2.06% for JPUS.

JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.12% for SMLV.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer