PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. FCTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. FCTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCTR's 15.16% return.


JPUS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.45%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.59%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.49%

FCTR

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.63%
YTD
15.16%
6M
15.25%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. FCTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
11.55%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-10.69%
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
15.16%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and FCTR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between JPUS and FCTR has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPUS vs. FCTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
FCTR

Technology

11.6%
19.3%

Healthcare

11.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
8.1%

Real Estate

10.5%
7.8%

Industrials

10.4%
9.4%

Utilities

9.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

8.0%
18.7%

Energy

7.3%
6.5%

Basic Materials

6.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.5%

Technology

JPUS
11.6%
FCTR
19.3%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.5%
FCTR
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.3%
FCTR
8.1%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
FCTR
7.8%

Industrials

JPUS
10.4%
FCTR
9.4%

Utilities

JPUS
9.5%
FCTR
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
FCTR
8.5%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.0%
FCTR
18.7%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
FCTR
6.5%

Basic Materials

JPUS
6.8%
FCTR
4.6%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.5%
FCTR
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. FCTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. FCTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPUSFCTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.10

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

7.66

+4.45

JPUS vs. FCTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FCTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and FCTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPUSFCTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.34

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.22

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.47

+0.25

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. FCTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FCTR drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and FCTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSFCTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-37.10%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-11.17%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-22.63%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-37.10%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.76%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-10.40%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.05%

-1.33%

Volatility

JPUS vs. FCTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.90%, while First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSFCTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

6.82%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

11.84%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

17.53%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

19.64%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

21.94%

-5.18%

JPUS vs. FCTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPUS vs. FCTR - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than FCTR's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.04%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and FCTR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to JPUS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs FCTR's -37.10%.

On 5-year performance, JPUS leads with 9.40% vs 4.29% for FCTR. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.

JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FCTR is Large Cap Growth Equities. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.65% for FCTR.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and FCTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer