JPUS vs. DFND
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - JPUS tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPUS returned 11.49%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DFND. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
JPUS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, JPUS has outperformed DFND with an annualized return of 11.49%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively lower 7.16% annualized return.
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
JPUS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 11.55% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 10.98% | -8.47% | 29.09% | 7.54% | 25.50% | -6.14% | 20.58% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and DFND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JPUS and DFND has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
JPUS vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPUS
DFND
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
JPUS
DFND
Healthcare
JPUS
DFND
Consumer Defensive
JPUS
DFND
Real Estate
JPUS
DFND
Industrials
JPUS
DFND
Utilities
JPUS
DFND
-
Consumer Cyclical
JPUS
DFND
Financial Services
JPUS
DFND
Energy
JPUS
DFND
Basic Materials
JPUS
DFND
Communication Services
JPUS
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
DFND
JPUS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.07 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 0.13 | +11.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.02 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.21 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.38 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.36 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -22.65% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -3.44% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -12.56% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -22.65% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | -22.65% | -16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -3.69% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -5.70% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 3.70% | -1.98% |
Volatility
JPUS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that JPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 0.00% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 6.16% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 10.92% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 22.46% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 19.09% | -2.33% |
JPUS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and DFND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPUS has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.49% vs 7.16% for DFND. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 1.50% for DFND.
JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer