PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSV vs. SQLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JPSV vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JPSV vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
1.38%0.63%8.73%9.72%
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
2.33%2.50%4.76%11.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSV achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 2.33% return.


JPSV

1D
1.20%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.63%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
10Y*

SQLV

1D
1.41%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
2.33%
6M
3.74%
1Y
17.85%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPSV vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JPSV vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSV
JPSV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
JPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SQLV
SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSV vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPSVSQLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

0.81

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.71

1.29

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.16

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.37

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.96

4.69

-2.73

JPSV vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSV Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSV and SQLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPSVSQLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

0.81

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.34

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between JPSV and SQLV is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JPSV vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than SQLV's 1.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.42%1.21%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
1.11%1.15%1.11%1.09%1.24%1.12%1.22%1.20%1.08%0.40%

Drawdowns

JPSV vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and SQLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSVSQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.78%

-48.34%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-12.92%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-5.16%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-9.10%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

3.79%

+0.23%

Volatility

JPSV vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) is 4.43%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that JPSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPSVSQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

5.25%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

12.40%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

22.07%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

21.04%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

23.50%

-5.36%