JPSV vs. OMFS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) and OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. JPSV is actively managed, while OMFS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPSV returned 13.15%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for OMFS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPSV charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for OMFS.

Performance

JPSV vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JPSV having a 20.89% return and OMFS slightly lower at 20.30%.

JPSV

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: 5.55%
• 6M: 14.88%
• YTD: 20.89%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 13.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMFS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.92%
• 6M: 12.02%
• YTD: 20.30%
• 1Y: 32.18%
• 3Y*: 14.93%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSV vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF	20.89%	0.63%	8.73%	9.99%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	20.30%	13.34%	3.98%	8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSV and OMFS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2023	0.89

The correlation between JPSV and OMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPSV vs. OMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPSV	OMFS
Financial Services	24.8%	25.2%
Industrials	13.1%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	7.9%
Technology	9.8%	11.4%
Real Estate	9.7%	10.7%
Healthcare	7.4%	13.1%
Communication Services	7.1%	0.7%
Energy	5.8%	2.8%
Utilities	5.6%	0.6%
Basic Materials	4.0%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	2.8%

Return for Risk

JPSV vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSV

JPSV Risk / Return Rank: 62
JPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 75
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSV vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPSV	OMFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.84	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.71	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.45	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	11.88	-4.38

JPSV vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSV and OMFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPSV vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and OMFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPSV	OMFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.78%	-42.50%	+19.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-9.38%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.78%	-22.35%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.47%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-10.35%	+4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	2.72%	+0.52%

Volatility

JPSV vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) at 3.37%. This indicates that JPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPSV	OMFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	3.37%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	12.58%	-2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	17.64%	-2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	21.36%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	24.20%	-6.42%

JPSV vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPSV vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than OMFS's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF	1.17%	1.42%	1.21%	1.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.08%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPSV and OMFS in my portfolio?

JPSV and OMFS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPSV or OMFS?

JPSV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to OMFS (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSV dropped -22.78% vs OMFS's -42.50%.

Which ETF is better, JPSV or OMFS?

On 3-year performance, OMFS leads with 14.93% vs 13.15% for JPSV. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPSV or OMFS?

Over the 3-year period, OMFS has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPSV or OMFS?

OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPSV or OMFS?

JPSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.08% for OMFS.

What is the main difference between JPSV and OMFS?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JPSV and 0.39% for OMFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.