JPO vs. NANC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Tidal, while NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPO returned 19.08% vs 19.87% for NANC. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JPO charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NANC.

Performance

JPO vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPO having a 8.98% return and NANC slightly higher at 9.12%.

JPO

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 5.47%
• 6M: 14.60%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.53%

NANC

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 1Y: 19.87%
• 3Y*: 20.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	$418.56K	$404.33K	$336.84K
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	$826.89K	$806.25K	$1.03M

JPO vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	8.98%	22.26%	13.97%	4.90%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	9.12%	18.54%	26.83%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JPO and NANC is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023	0.42

Return for Risk

JPO vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPO

JPO Risk / Return Rank: 34
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 47
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPO vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPO	NANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.20	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.72	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.21	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	1.47	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	5.80	-2.80

JPO vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPO vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and NANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPO	NANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.80%	-20.94%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-12.21%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-1.72%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-2.64%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	3.09%	+2.63%

Volatility

JPO vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 4.54%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPO	NANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	4.54%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.08%	11.90%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.41%	14.96%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	16.81%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	16.81%	+2.25%

JPO vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPO vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	31.81%	34.13%	25.15%	4.84%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPO and NANC in my portfolio?

JPO and NANC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPO or NANC?

JPO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to NANC (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPO dropped -24.80% vs NANC's -20.94%.

Which ETF is better, JPO or NANC?

On 1-year performance, NANC leads with 19.87% vs 19.08% for JPO. On fees, NANC is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, NANC has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPO or NANC?

Over the 1-year period, NANC has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPO or NANC?

NANC is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPO or NANC?

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

What is the main difference between JPO and NANC?

JPO is categorized as Options Trading, while NANC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for JPO and 0.72% for NANC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.