PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPO vs. APRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JPO vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JPO vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
-7.93%22.26%13.97%5.08%
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
2.08%7.99%15.15%5.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a -7.93% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 2.08% return.


JPO

1D
2.97%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-7.93%
6M
-6.79%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRT

1D
2.34%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.40%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPO vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JPO vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPO
JPO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPO vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPOAPRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.34

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

2.04

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.77

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

11.67

-8.69

JPO vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and APRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPOAPRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.34

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.99

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between JPO and APRT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JPO vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, while APRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
33.69%34.13%25.15%4.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%

Drawdowns

JPO vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, which is greater than APRT's maximum drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and APRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JPOAPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.80%

-14.98%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-8.70%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

0.00%

-10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-2.11%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

1.32%

+3.90%

Volatility

JPO vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) at 3.02%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPOAPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.02%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

3.81%

+11.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

10.98%

+10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

10.82%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

10.40%

+8.71%