PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPME vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPME vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 19.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPME having a 11.23% annualized return and SCHM not far ahead at 11.71%.


JPME

1D
0.35%
1M
1.46%
YTD
13.87%
6M
12.64%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
11.23%

SCHM

1D
-1.73%
1M
2.88%
YTD
19.11%
6M
16.97%
1Y
31.33%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPME vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
13.87%8.26%13.55%11.28%-10.12%28.90%8.46%25.87%-8.92%19.09%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.11%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JPME and SCHM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016

0.94

The correlation between JPME and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPME vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPME
SCHM

Technology

13.0%
22.1%

Real Estate

11.5%
6.4%

Industrials

11.4%
21.7%

Healthcare

11.2%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
3.4%

Utilities

9.0%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.8%

Financial Services

7.8%
10.9%

Basic Materials

7.2%
4.7%

Energy

7.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.6%

Technology

JPME
13.0%
SCHM
22.1%

Real Estate

JPME
11.5%
SCHM
6.4%

Industrials

JPME
11.4%
SCHM
21.7%

Healthcare

JPME
11.2%
SCHM
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

JPME
9.2%
SCHM
3.4%

Utilities

JPME
9.0%
SCHM
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JPME
8.9%
SCHM
10.8%

Financial Services

JPME
7.8%
SCHM
10.9%

Basic Materials

JPME
7.2%
SCHM
4.7%

Energy

JPME
7.1%
SCHM
3.4%

Communication Services

JPME
3.7%
SCHM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPME vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPME vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPMESCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.38

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

13.48

-0.90

JPME vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPME Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPME and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPME vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMESCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.01%

-42.43%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-9.32%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-23.27%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-26.46%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

-42.43%

+1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.73%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-5.64%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.33%

-0.49%

Volatility

JPME vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 3.33%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMESCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

5.75%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

12.61%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

16.30%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

19.67%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

20.49%

-2.78%

JPME vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPME vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SCHM's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.81%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%0.00%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JPME and SCHM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to JPME (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.71% vs 11.23% for JPME. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPME.

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.

JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.04% for SCHM.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPME and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer