PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPME vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPME vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JPME has outperformed PWC with an annualized return of 11.00%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.


JPME

1D
0.93%
1M
1.41%
YTD
13.26%
6M
13.96%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
11.00%

PWC

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
5.98%
6M
6.32%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPME vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
13.26%8.26%13.55%11.28%-10.12%28.90%8.46%25.87%-8.92%19.09%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
5.98%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JPME and PWC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.85

The correlation between JPME and PWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPME vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPME
PWC

Technology

12.0%
26.1%

Real Estate

11.5%
5.6%

Industrials

11.5%
10.3%

Healthcare

10.7%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
6.8%

Utilities

9.4%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
11.5%

Financial Services

8.1%
14.0%

Energy

7.8%
5.5%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
7.0%

Technology

JPME
12.0%
PWC
26.1%

Real Estate

JPME
11.5%
PWC
5.6%

Industrials

JPME
11.5%
PWC
10.3%

Healthcare

JPME
10.7%
PWC
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

JPME
9.6%
PWC
6.8%

Utilities

JPME
9.4%
PWC
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JPME
8.8%
PWC
11.5%

Financial Services

JPME
8.1%
PWC
14.0%

Energy

JPME
7.8%
PWC
5.5%

Basic Materials

JPME
7.0%
PWC
3.5%

Communication Services

JPME
3.6%
PWC
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPME vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPME vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPMEPWCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

0.92

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

1.39

+1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.41

+2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.67

4.34

+8.34

JPME vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPME Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPME and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPMEPWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

0.92

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.39

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.51

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.11

+0.53

Drawdowns

JPME vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMEPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.01%

-78.13%

+37.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-6.45%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-15.12%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-26.58%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

-39.45%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.25%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-36.21%

+31.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.10%

-0.26%

Volatility

JPME vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.31%. This indicates that JPME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMEPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

2.31%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

7.24%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

9.74%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

16.07%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

18.82%

-1.12%

JPME vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPME vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than PWC's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.82%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%0.00%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.68%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPME and PWC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPME has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to PWC (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 10-year performance, JPME leads with 11.00% vs 9.53% for PWC. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPME has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.68% for PWC.

JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.60% for PWC.

JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPME and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer