PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPM vs. ATI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JPM vs. ATI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than ATI's 72.95% return. Over the past 10 years, JPM has underperformed ATI with an annualized return of 21.02%, while ATI has yielded a comparatively higher 31.31% annualized return.


JPM

1D
2.31%
1M
7.69%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.66%
1Y
23.40%
3Y*
34.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
21.02%

ATI

1D
-0.51%
1M
28.70%
YTD
72.95%
6M
82.16%
1Y
133.59%
3Y*
69.52%
5Y*
52.82%
10Y*
31.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPM vs. ATI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.50%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
72.95%108.50%21.05%52.28%87.45%-5.01%-18.83%-5.10%-9.82%51.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JPM and ATI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1999

0.43

The correlation between JPM and ATI shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

JPM:

$21.08

ATI:

$4.02

PE Ratio

JPM:

15.21

ATI:

49.39

PEG Ratio

JPM:

1.68

ATI:

2.13

PS Ratio

JPM:

3.14

ATI:

4.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

JPM:

$285.09B

ATI:

$4.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JPM:

$173.52B

ATI:

$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

JPM:

$81.46B

ATI:

$773.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPM vs. ATI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ATI
ATI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ATI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ATI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPM vs. ATI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPMATIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

5.40

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

13.48

-10.13

JPM vs. ATI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ATI Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPM and ATI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPM vs. ATI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, smaller than the maximum ATI drawdown of -94.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and ATI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMATIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.16%

-94.72%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-25.31%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.42%

-38.02%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

-39.03%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.63%

-82.43%

+38.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-0.51%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-60.76%

+43.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

10.12%

-3.58%

Volatility

JPM vs. ATI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is 6.35%, while Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that JPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMATIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

13.44%

-7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

29.89%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

42.63%

-20.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

43.12%

-18.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

51.55%

-24.16%

Dividends

JPM vs. ATI - Dividend Comparison

JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.51%5.51%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.84%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

JPM vs. ATI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Allegheny Technologies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
73.66B
1.15B
(JPM) Total Revenue
(ATI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JPM vs. ATI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Allegheny Technologies Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
64.3%
22.8%
Portfolio components
JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

ATI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 262.90M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

ATI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

ATI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 118.20M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JPM and ATI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATI has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to JPM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs ATI's -94.72%.

ATI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPM and ATI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer