JPLD vs. SCHJ
JPLD (JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. JPLD is actively managed, while SCHJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPLD returned 5.80%/yr vs 5.41%/yr for SCHJ. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JPLD charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPLD achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHJ's 0.85% return.
JPLD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.74%
SCHJ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.92M | $21.44M | $24.07M | |
| $5.83M | $7.78M | $6.51M |
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | 1.59% | 6.01% | 6.49% | 3.15% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.85% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPLD and SCHJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between JPLD and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPLD vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
JPLD
SCHJ
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPLD | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 2.11 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.37 | 7.94 | +9.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPLD drawdown since its inception was -1.17%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLD and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPLD | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -13.62% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.00% | -1.47% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -1.47% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.15% | -1.84% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.39% | -0.17% |
Volatility
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) is 0.35%, while Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that JPLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPLD | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.51% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.09% | 1.53% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 1.86% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 2.96% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 4.10% | -2.28% |
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPLD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPLD vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
JPLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than SCHJ's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | 4.28% | 4.24% | 4.47% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPLD and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHJ has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to JPLD (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPLD dropped -1.17% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 3-year performance, JPLD leads with 5.80% vs 5.41% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JPLD has performed better with a 5.80% return vs 5.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.28% for JPLD.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPLD and 0.03% for SCHJ.
JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPLD and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer