JPFP vs. GXDW
JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) and GXDW (Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. JPFP is actively managed, while GXDW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPFP charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXDW.
Performance
JPFP vs. GXDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPFP
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXDW
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP vs. GXDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 1.07% |
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | -2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPFP and GXDW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPFP vs. GXDW — Risk / Return Rank
JPFP
GXDW
JPFP vs. GXDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPFP | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.75 | 0.12 | +9.63 |
Drawdowns
JPFP vs. GXDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum GXDW drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and GXDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPFP | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -67.81% | +67.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -50.50% | +49.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -43.09% | +42.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility
JPFP vs. GXDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPFP | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 25.52% | -14.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 27.63% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 29.59% | -18.20% |
JPFP vs. GXDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXDW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPFP vs. GXDW - Dividend Comparison
JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPFP and GXDW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXDW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXDW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JPFP.
GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 0.50% for GXDW.
Find the right allocation for JPFP and GXDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer