PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXDW vs. ASMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GXDW vs. ASMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GXDW vs. ASMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
-6.81%3.52%-2.52%
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
5.61%1.16%-3.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXDW achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than ASMF's 5.61% return.


GXDW

1D
3.90%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-6.81%
6M
-17.86%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
-2.86%
5Y*
-13.24%
10Y*

ASMF

1D
0.95%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
5.61%
6M
9.20%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GXDW vs. ASMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXDW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GXDW vs. ASMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXDW
GXDW Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GXDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXDW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GXDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXDW Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMF
ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXDW vs. ASMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXDWASMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

0.79

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.14

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.15

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.70

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.22

3.75

-3.98

GXDW vs. ASMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXDW Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ASMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXDW and ASMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXDWASMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

0.79

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.14

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between GXDW and ASMF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GXDW vs. ASMF - Dividend Comparison

GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than ASMF's 0.20% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
1.51%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
0.20%0.22%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GXDW vs. ASMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXDW drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than ASMF's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXDW and ASMF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GXDWASMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-15.31%

-52.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

-5.31%

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.16%

-4.12%

-59.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-8.10%

-34.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

2.54%

+7.23%

Volatility

GXDW vs. ASMF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) at 4.65%. This indicates that GXDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GXDWASMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

4.65%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.65%

9.90%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.44%

11.80%

+15.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.33%

11.21%

+16.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.54%

11.21%

+18.33%