PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPCT.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPCT.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPCT.DE having a 7.39% return and SCHG slightly higher at 7.69%.


JPCT.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
4.31%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.70%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.00%
1M
5.12%
YTD
7.69%
6M
5.99%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JPCT.DE
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
7.39%6.84%24.37%19.66%-14.19%34.64%2.14%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
8.00%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JPCT.DE and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.52

The correlation between JPCT.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPCT.DE
JPCT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPCT.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.42

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

4.12

+4.33

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPCT.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPCT.DESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.41

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.76

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.91

+0.04

Drawdowns

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPCT.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.18%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPCT.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPCT.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.18%

-31.88%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-15.64%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-28.18%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.18%

-30.34%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.46%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.23%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

5.40%

-3.20%

Volatility

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) is 2.80%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that JPCT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPCT.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.18%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

11.13%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

15.84%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

21.97%

-7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

21.86%

-7.97%

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPCT.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPCT.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

JPCT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPCT.DE
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPCT.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JPCT.DE.

JPCT.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. JPCT.DE tracks Solactive JP Morgan Asset Management Carbon Transition Global Equity, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPCT.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPCT.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer