PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOJO vs. XFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOJO vs. XFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than XFLX's 1.16% return.


JOJO

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.64%
1Y
9.64%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
10Y*

XFLX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.08%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOJO vs. XFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
2.29%10.52%2.74%10.55%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
1.16%2.56%4.01%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JOJO and XFLX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2023

0.65

The correlation between JOJO and XFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOJO vs. XFLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JOJO
XFLX

Utilities

99.7%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
3.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.0%

Communication Services

-

8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

2.1%

Financial Services

-

14.5%

Healthcare

-

9.4%

Industrials

-

17.4%

Technology

-

17.7%

Utilities

JOJO
99.7%
XFLX
8.9%

Real Estate

JOJO
0.3%
XFLX
3.7%

Basic Materials

JOJO

-

XFLX
7.0%

Communication Services

JOJO

-

XFLX
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JOJO

-

XFLX
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

JOJO

-

XFLX
4.6%

Energy

JOJO

-

XFLX
2.1%

Financial Services

JOJO

-

XFLX
14.5%

Healthcare

JOJO

-

XFLX
9.4%

Industrials

JOJO

-

XFLX
17.4%

Technology

JOJO

-

XFLX
17.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOJO vs. XFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOJO
JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XFLX
XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOJO vs. XFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOJOXFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.59

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

6.54

-0.88

JOJO vs. XFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOJO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the XFLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOJO and XFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOJOXFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.95

-1.00

Drawdowns

JOJO vs. XFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than XFLX's maximum drawdown of -6.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and XFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOJOXFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-6.54%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-3.11%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-0.45%

-5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-0.95%

-14.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.75%

+0.96%

Volatility

JOJO vs. XFLX - Volatility Comparison

ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOJOXFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.22%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

3.05%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.62%

3.53%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

4.70%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.31%

4.70%

+6.61%

JOJO vs. XFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XFLX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOJO vs. XFLX - Dividend Comparison

JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than XFLX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
5.13%4.78%4.88%4.30%3.63%2.53%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
9.68%9.80%4.55%4.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOJO and XFLX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XFLX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to JOJO (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOJO dropped -28.43% vs XFLX's -6.54%.

On 1-year performance, JOJO leads with 9.64% vs 4.92% for XFLX. On fees, XFLX is cheaper at 1.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XFLX is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 5.13% for JOJO.

They also come from different issuers: ATAC and FundX. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for JOJO and 1.17% for XFLX.

JOJO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOJO and XFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer