JOJO vs. XFLX
JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) and XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JOJO returned 9.64% vs 4.92% for XFLX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOJO charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for XFLX.
Performance
JOJO vs. XFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than XFLX's 1.16% return.
JOJO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 9.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFLX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JOJO vs. XFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 2.29% | 10.52% | 2.74% | 10.55% |
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF | 1.16% | 2.56% | 4.01% | 3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOJO and XFLX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between JOJO and XFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
JOJO vs. XFLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOJO
XFLX
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
JOJO
XFLX
Real Estate
JOJO
XFLX
Basic Materials
JOJO
-
XFLX
Communication Services
JOJO
-
XFLX
Consumer Cyclical
JOJO
-
XFLX
Consumer Defensive
JOJO
-
XFLX
Energy
JOJO
-
XFLX
Financial Services
JOJO
-
XFLX
Healthcare
JOJO
-
XFLX
Industrials
JOJO
-
XFLX
Technology
JOJO
-
XFLX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOJO vs. XFLX — Risk / Return Rank
JOJO
XFLX
JOJO vs. XFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOJO | XFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.59 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 6.54 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOJO | XFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.95 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
JOJO vs. XFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than XFLX's maximum drawdown of -6.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and XFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOJO | XFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -6.54% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -3.11% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -0.45% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -0.95% | -14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.75% | +0.96% |
Volatility
JOJO vs. XFLX - Volatility Comparison
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOJO | XFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.22% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.83% | 3.05% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 3.53% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 4.70% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 4.70% | +6.61% |
JOJO vs. XFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XFLX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOJO vs. XFLX - Dividend Comparison
JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than XFLX's 9.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 5.13% | 4.78% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 3.63% | 2.53% |
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF | 9.68% | 9.80% | 4.55% | 4.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOJO and XFLX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XFLX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to JOJO (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOJO dropped -28.43% vs XFLX's -6.54%.
On 1-year performance, JOJO leads with 9.64% vs 4.92% for XFLX. On fees, XFLX is cheaper at 1.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XFLX is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.
XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 5.13% for JOJO.
They also come from different issuers: ATAC and FundX. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for JOJO and 1.17% for XFLX.
JOJO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOJO and XFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer