JOJO vs. RDFI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI).

JOJO and RDFI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JOJO is an actively managed fund by ATAC. It was launched on Jul 15, 2021. RDFI is an actively managed fund by Rareview Funds. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020.

Performance

JOJO vs. RDFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JOJO vs. RDFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	0.94%	10.52%	2.74%	7.61%	-22.01%	-0.36%
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	-1.34%	9.83%	13.15%	8.57%	-17.06%	0.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than RDFI's -1.34% return.

JOJO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDFI

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 6M: -1.32%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: 9.19%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOJO vs. RDFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RDFI's 3.69% expense ratio.

RDFI

Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

JOJO

ATAC Credit Rotation ETF

Return for Risk

JOJO vs. RDFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOJO

JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 43
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

RDFI

RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 31
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOJO vs. RDFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JOJO	RDFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.66	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	0.89	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.15	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	0.74	+0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	2.98	+0.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JOJO vs. RDFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOJO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the RDFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOJO and RDFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JOJO	RDFI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.66	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.72	-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between JOJO and RDFI is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JOJO vs. RDFI - Dividend Comparison

JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than RDFI's 8.36% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	4.99%	4.78%	4.88%	4.30%	3.63%	2.53%	0.00%
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	8.36%	8.17%	8.14%	7.38%	4.70%	6.78%	1.01%

Drawdowns

JOJO vs. RDFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than RDFI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and RDFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JOJO	RDFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-23.71%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.54%	-8.01%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.13%	-5.74%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-7.34%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.99%	+0.12%

Volatility

JOJO vs. RDFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) is 3.31%, while Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that JOJO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JOJO	RDFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	4.42%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.20%	5.70%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.26%	8.40%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.47%	8.06%	+3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.47%	7.96%	+3.51%