JOET vs. VCLN
JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and VCLN (Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JOET is a Momentum fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while VCLN is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. JOET is passively managed, while VCLN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JOET returned 18.62%/yr vs 20.62%/yr for VCLN. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for VCLN.
Performance
JOET vs. VCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than VCLN's 39.16% return.
JOET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- —
VCLN
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 11.34%
- YTD
- 39.16%
- 6M
- 37.23%
- 1Y
- 95.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JOET vs. VCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 7.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 8.10% |
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF | 39.16% | 55.75% | -6.69% | -17.54% | -7.87% | -5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOET and VCLN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between JOET and VCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JOET vs. VCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOET
VCLN
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Technology
JOET
VCLN
Industrials
JOET
VCLN
Financial Services
JOET
VCLN
-
Healthcare
JOET
VCLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
JOET
VCLN
-
Energy
JOET
VCLN
Communication Services
JOET
VCLN
-
Basic Materials
JOET
VCLN
-
Real Estate
JOET
VCLN
-
Consumer Defensive
JOET
VCLN
-
Utilities
JOET
VCLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOET vs. VCLN — Risk / Return Rank
JOET
VCLN
JOET vs. VCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOET | VCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.51 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 7.66 | -6.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 29.03 | -23.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOET | VCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 3.30 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.30 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
JOET vs. VCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum VCLN drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and VCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOET | VCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -45.66% | +19.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -12.58% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -29.25% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.16% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -24.09% | +16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 3.31% | -0.60% |
Volatility
JOET vs. VCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOET | VCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 9.04% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 20.11% | -9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 29.22% | -15.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 27.43% | -9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 27.43% | -9.91% |
JOET vs. VCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOET vs. VCLN - Dividend Comparison
JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VCLN's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% |
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF | 1.45% | 2.01% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOET and VCLN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCLN has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs VCLN's -45.66%.
On 3-year performance, VCLN leads with 20.62% vs 18.62% for JOET. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VCLN has performed better with a 20.62% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VCLN.
VCLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.61% for JOET.
JOET is categorized as Momentum, while VCLN is Sustainable. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.59% for VCLN.
VCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOET and VCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer